Right of Consumers

December 27th, 2020, 12:25 pm Mirage It was published yesterday in the social networks of the social worker, Mauricio J. da Silva -PUC / SP, 58 with the title of Mirragem a question to Advocacia Paulista under his view of internal coherence, because, it does not dispute the same merit of the advocacy work provided by Dr. Jussara in defending his clients, more, yes, the fact that he was not accountable at Interdiçao 2017 digital forum of Sto. Amaro and now she is the one who defends the Inventory (ninth notary J.Mendes / 20o2 for the same clients in which she recognizes the procedure given by Dr. Juiza Beatriz Caputo in her sentence, but, I argue in her counter-petition that to an inertia of 18 in the inventory, but that Mr. Mauricio should have contested the action earlier than at least 10 years ago, considering that accountability was requested at least 4 times in the Inventory removal process and how much was finally presented had its accounts denied by the Judiciary accountant. He also recalls that Dr. Flávia Beatriz was communicated by her lawyers at the time and the same protrocoled petition and forwarded Emails to contest the Interdiction. And note what the Judges and Dr. Jussara have in common are from Santo Amaro. Follow the publication below. Mirage December 26, 2020