Criticizes the Legal Reason / In search of a service to the Consumer in Public Services .

Criticizes the Legal Reason / In search of a service to the Consumer in Public Services June 14, 2021 Criticizes the Legal Reason In Kant we have a critique to move away from what makes us wake up from our Dogmatic dream and distance ourselves from the Philosophical/Ideological Reality. In discards, we have to wake up to reality and break it into small parts until we conceive the truth and understand the totality. In the Brazilian legal system, we have sometimes found ourselves with the absurd and even the distancing of positive jurisprudence in this sense, the facts as presented by not only documentary reality, but also by the notary practice lived in the concrete reality of everyday life, process by process and our temporal conveniences and the play of personal and/or institutional interests. Thus, being guided by this feeling and vocation, he asks me how much time is needed to make a removal of an inventor in a process that has been stopped for 17 years, even in the name of procedural celerity, as published in the DJE on 05/28/21 of the MM. Judge of the ninth Court of Families and Successions of the Capital. This process had already been announced by the same Honorable From this district, already sentenced to account by the Honorable Judge of the 11th Family Court and Capital Probate. That after the conviction, it granted 15 for a new rendering of accounts, which was not obeyed and it also did not pronounce itself in the case in question. It had already been requested by Mrs. MM. Judge of the Public Treasury of São Paulo and still had her accounts refused by the head of the Coordination of Judicial Calculations Mrs. Célia Preas on 07/28/2020 pages. 273 and sharing the capital's sharer. That in addition to the 04 unsuccessful attempts of requests for accountability signed by the bailiff. There are other factors, such as the first lawyer herself who in a statement in the case records states that the process was for 17 years and even the lawyer who defends the defendant also states in a petition to the Honorable Judge that the process has actually been stopped for seventeen years and that in an attempt to invert the facts and values, it tries to show that the plaintiff, Mr. Mauricio, should be penalized for not having manifested himself beforehand about the Inventory process. The same, Ms. Jussara Campos Costa, who was also the lawyer in the interdiction process, reminds in her initial that the interdict is a simple person without possessions who had not been verified by the Honorable Judge of the Tenth Family and Probate Court of Santo Amaro, since the petitioner for the Interdiction signed a petition for Free Justice, thus being responsible for the fact. "Nevertheless, I have that the documentation attached to the records must be complemented, which is why I request to attach the part of the defendant's marriage certificate and the death certificate of the deceased husband, as well as clarify the part if the defendant has other children (if so , attaching the consent term with the trustee), social security benefits and assets in its name, attaching the respective supporting documentation. SP 03/31/2017" Civil Prosecutor's Office Sto.Amaro fls.23 interdiction process. Prosecutor Bruno CB Feria But, I must remember and warn that the Prosecutor in the MP's opinion "emphasizes that if there are other heirs, they should sign a document of consent to proceed with the procedural truth that was forgotten / hidden by both Mrs. Lawyer and Mrs. MM. Judge in the case. So, after one year of the first petition of the Judge of the ninth court for the appearance and rendering of accounts of the Defendant and after all attempts to render accounts, it was still proven that she had no interest and to continue the process also after her counterclaim to the process. I see as Unreasonable there is no critical position of the Judge because the Public Ministry gave its opinion on February 17, 2021 in the person of Ms. Liliane de Oliveira as noted in the original process to the Honorable Judge after the last request for accountability of Ms. Prosecutor Roberta Shimmi on 01/15/2021 in the original process of the MP. And given that in his order Mr. MM "RELATION No. 0087/2021 P process 0007863-03.2020.8.26.0100 (main case 0093427-77.2002.8.26.0100) - Inventory removal - Inventory and Sharing - Mauricio José da Silva - Edilene Maria da Silva - Visas. Certify the expiry of the deadline for the applicant's manifestation in relation to what is determined in the dispatch of sheets 111. As pointed out by the Public Prosecutor's Office, neither the inventor nor the applicant are handling the case files well. The inventor who left the records of the inventory paralyzed for 17 years," but had also already published in the DJE that the defendant after 17 years was no longer able to continue with the work of the inventory, just not having pronounced the petition of the Mr. Mauricio has already been manifestly made on several occasions by his lawyers, arriving at the same after the various attempts of requests for accountability made with a petition that is judged